호텔 평점의 신뢰성을 보장하기 위해 단순히 평점의 평균값을 계산하는 게 아니라, 리뷰의 신뢰도와 투숙객의 숙박 날짜를 고려하여 과학적인 계산 방식을 통해 최종 평점을 산출합니다.
실제 투숙객 이용후기
위치6.2
시설5.8
서비스5.8
청결도6.0
결과 내 검색:
정렬 기준:
모든 리뷰(105)
높은 평점 리뷰(3)
사진/동영상 리뷰(2)
평점 낮은 리뷰(4)
Isao Kaku
킹룸 (금연)
투숙일: 2025년 1월
출장객
리뷰 1개
4.5/10
작성일: 2025년 2월 9일
너무 낡고 노후함. 호텔로서의 서비스는 전무함. 잠만 잔다면 ok
익명 사용자
투숙일: 2023년 7월
기타
리뷰 2개
5.5/10
작성일: 2023년 8월 23일
방에 거미줄이 두 개나 있었습니다. 호텔이 리노베이션 중이라 시끄럽지는 않았지만, 전반적인 환경이 열악했고, 일부 도로는 막혀 있었습니다. 복도 양쪽 모퉁이에는 누군가 앉아 있는 의자가 하나 놓여 있었는데, 손님인지 다른 사람인지 알 수 없었습니다.
원문 보기Google로 번역됨
리뷰어
투숙일: 2023년 2월
기타
리뷰 26개
8.0/10
아주 좋음
작성일: 2023년 3월 12일
호텔은 비교적 오래되었습니다. 엘리베이터도 정말 오래되었습니다. 소리가 어디에서든 들립니다.
원문 보기Google로 번역됨
리뷰어
룸 - 킹 침대 1개 - 청각시설 또는 장애인 지원 - 욕조 및 손잡이 포함 - 금연
투숙일: 2025년 9월
커플
리뷰 1개
3.5/10
작성일: 2025년 10월 20일
The hotel's elevators were not functioning. The front desk staff was not helpful. The room was run down, and the thermostat didn't work. The staff said they would have someone fix it, but they never did, and I was told there were no additional blankets for the bed. (temp never came above 62 degrees farenheit).
Also, I ended up in a 'Handicapped Accessible' room even though I did not request one, and they insisted I had asked for one. Even if I were someone needing a wheelchair, this room would not have actually been accessible. The room was arranged for wider rolling, and the bathroom sink was roll-under, but the shower was a regular bathtub with sides. There were two handle bars, but they were not place in a way that would help someone transfer from a wheelchair to a shower chard (had there been one, which there wasn't). Also the shower head was higher than a short standing person could reach, and there was no hand-held shower head accommodation. I have pictures if anyone wants to see them.
Also - and not as critical as an accessible shower - the iron was up so high I could barely reach it, and I'm 5'8".
To add insult to injury, I had modified my room reservation within the Trip.com to leave a day earlier than originally booked. I was well-within the cancellation/modification agreed timeline, however Trip.com has said (even after three attempts with different support people) that they could not refund me for the one day I would not be staying because the hotel would not refund a third party. When I asked the hotel, they said that if I didn't stay I (or the third party Trip.com) would not be charged. So WHY is Trip.com refusing to refund me the money for the night I did not stay? I will never use Trip.com again, I will never prepay again, and I certainly will never stay at the Wyndham Rochester again. Not worth the small savings over other hotels and travel companies.
번역
리뷰어
투숙일: 2023년 7월
가족 단위
리뷰 2개
3.0/10
작성일: 2023년 8월 31일
under renovation till 2023-12
Breakfast is OK, huge portion